December 2, 2023


A Home Grown Success

5 Essential Flaws Of The Vanguard True Estate ETF (NYSEARCA:VNQ)

Vladimir Zakharov/iStock by way of Getty Pictures

The primary notion of buying a wide real estate ETF is to get diversified publicity to the substantial returns that true estate generates. I strongly aid the strategy of diversified exposure to authentic estate in common and especially in this setting as REITs advantage from inflation and are on the cusp of outstanding rental revenue advancement.

Nonetheless, I believe the sector is underneath the untrue impact that a actual estate ETF gives these types of exposure. It is solely easy to understand that just one would consider the Vanguard Real Estate ETF (NYSEARCA:VNQ) with 164 holdings would be diversified, but there are obvious flaws that make it suboptimal in overall return general performance and overly concentrated in just a number of home styles.

Vanguard is a respectable and legitimate operator of ETFs. The VNQ cleanly tracks the selected index and has a quite cheap cost ratio at 12 foundation details. My qualm is not with the way the ETF is operated, but rather with the notion of monitoring the REIT index in the initially area.

VNQ – The Offer And Substitute Thesis

There are five vital flaws of the VNQ:

  1. Not agent of the genuine real estate financial system
  2. Not a diversified publicity
  3. Adverse obtain and sale activity based on momentum
  4. Totally omits vital house sorts
  5. Incidental market distortion on inclusion

The net result is suboptimal exposure to genuine estate.

I suspect very similar flaws exist in most cap weighted ETFs but I am less privy to their inefficiencies. In studying REITs just about every working day the troubles of the VNQ are commonly clear.

Current market Cap Weighting

In setting up a passive ETF 1 typically has to pick out both cap weighted or equal weighted. Each and every technique has its challenges in that equal weighted final results in a considerable chubby to modest and micro-cap organizations which will induce the ETF to be overly uncovered to the dangers that occur with staying subscale.

A marketplace cap weighted ETF such as the VNQ will properly reflect the publicly traded marketplace. In so executing, it can take on what ever distortions exist in the current market. In the scenario of genuine estate, the REIT index is pretty dissimilar from the true estate industry as a whole. The difference lies in the ratio of publicly owned as opposed to privately owned.

Cell towers, for instance are a relatively small portion of the overall real estate market, but they are overwhelmingly owned by publicly traded REITs. As these kinds of, towers end up remaining a substantial portion of the VNQ regardless of becoming just a tiny slice of the genuine estate economic climate.

The opposite is correct of one-family homes which are an massive section of the authentic overall economy but just about non-existent in the index. Why? Simply because there are only a pair of REITs that deal in solitary household homes and their aggregate marketplace cap is not large.

In my eyes this tends to make the VNQ a non-diversified way of owning serious estate. There are two means to seem at diversification in serious estate:

  1. Matching the exposures of the authentic economic system this kind of that if serious estate as an whole asset course does effectively you will do nicely.
  2. Reducing publicity to any solitary issue these types of that no single failure can final result in massive losses.

Below is the sector breakdown of the VNQ which I imagine soundly fails both of those actions of diversification.

Chart, pie chart Description automatically generated


To be reasonable, specialised REITs is a wide bucket class that encapsulates a few home sorts, specifically towers and data facilities so no single publicity in the VNQ is 35%. However, there are some 8-12% exposures that are largely a single financial factor.

Thus, inspite of staying a 164-stock portfolio, a single is really only getting the diversification of a approximately 10-stock portfolio. Rather simply, when you presently possess an business REIT, getting a second, third, fourth, and fifth place of work REIT will not definitely do a lot in conditions of diversification. It’s possible it minimizes idiosyncratic one stock danger, but variable exposures are nonetheless fairly tough.

As found previously mentioned, office is now a 7.1% pounds in the VNQ, but rewind about 5 yrs to before office turned the troubled asset course that it is right now and it was nearer to a 15%-20% fat depending on the quarter in which a person appeared. Retail was also a massive sector publicity for VNQ back again then.

So how did these large exposures drop to 7.1% and 10.5% respectively?

They executed inadequately.

A continual issue with market place cap weighted indices is that they chase efficiency. The exposure will essentially be at a most when a sector is on leading of the entire world and at a minimum amount when a sector is out of favor. This triggers a tendency to be obese overvalued and underweight that which is undervalued.

Coming out of the economic crisis, Industrial was just a tiny sliver of the VNQ, but now that industrial is king it is one particular of the more substantial sector exposures. As the market proceeds to flux, the performance chasing inherent in market place cap weighting will systematically lead to just one obtaining reduced levels of exposure on the way up and better levels of publicity on the way down. That is purchase significant and market minimal. The reverse of what one should really be undertaking.

This trouble is not special to the VNQ, but truly the difficulty with index investing in normal. Passive share was much decreased again in 2000, but relaxation assured it would have been chock entire of dot-com names correct ahead of the bubble burst. This is not speculation on my element. It is just mathematically how it performs.

Omission By Insignificant Excess weight In Essential Property Styles

There are 21 true estate assets forms that are accessible in publicly traded providers. The VNQ only has meaningful publicity to about 12 of them. Some of the omitted home sorts also happen to be among the the strongest basic spots.

  • Created housing is the swiftest increasing sector as measured by organic exact same store NOI expansion nevertheless it is considerably less than 2% of the VNQ as of 3/31/22 – 1.13% Sun Communities (Sunlight) .74% Fairness Way of life (ELS) and .07% UMH Homes (UMH).
  • Farmland is a $2.6 trillion asset class in the U.S yet only a .07% exposure in the VNQ via Gladstone Land (LAND)
  • Single loved ones houses are the biggest part of true estate by price but only 2% of the VNQ – 1.33% Invitation Properties (INVH) and .67% American Houses for Rent (AMH).
  • Lifetime science labs are in high demand, suffering from rent rollups of all over 30% however the VNQ only has a 1.64% publicity via Alexandria (ARE)

The portion of one’s portfolio that goes into a offered exposure must be based mostly on elementary toughness, not on prevalence in just an index.

Incidental Marketplace Distortion From Inclusion

Most REITs are owned somewhere in between 7% and 15% by Vanguard, most of which will come by way of the VNQ. As an illustration we can look at Prologis (PLD) which is now the biggest REIT.

Graphical user interface, table Description automatically generated

S&P Worldwide Current market Intelligence

Vanguard owns 13%.

As soon as it is in there it is wonderful but the course of action of obtaining in can be fairly bumpy. There is a bare minimum size threshold for a REIT to be involved in the VNQ and ideal now that is close to $600 million.

As a REIT crosses this threshold it usually will get extra to the underlying index at the next assessment period of time and the VNQ proceeds to acquire a large part of superb shares. The inflow of shopping for from the very low investing volume of the smaller cap situation will rather persistently bring about it to bounce up in rate any where from 3% to 10% as the VNQ will take in its shares.

As an active trader, I love this simply because it is just one of the most predictable value movements and really easy to get edge of.

For a VNQ investor, however, it is a lousy point because it means the VNQ is perhaps having to spend 3%-10% over the past VWAP (quantity weighted regular value) to get the shares.

Wrapping It Up

Whilst Vanguard has set collectively an straightforward and clean instrument for investing in the REIT index, the index itself is flawed. I feel the five significant challenges mentioned previously mentioned will induce VNQ to systematically underperform true estate as an asset course.